Fri Feb 14, 2003 10:41 am by IntelliDroid
What the viewer believes about Rachael's longevity would depend primarily on which version (happy ending vs. ambiguous ending) of the film was seen.<BR><BR>Although I'm sure that Tyrell probably had other replicants working for him in some capacity, the fact that Rachael served as his assistant (whatever that job description involves) indicates, in my opinion at least, that she was indeed special in some way. Whether or not this means that she had no pre-determined termination date is best left up to the individual preferences of the viewer.<BR><BR>The topic of Rachael's lifespan is similar to the one concerning whether or not Deckard is human. Despite what the director, the producer, the screenwriter, or anyone else says, I feel that this film has taken on a life of its own and that the these issues are up to the individual viewer. <BR><BR>Personally, I think Deckard is human and that Rachael indeed does not have a pre-determined four-year lifespan. <BR><BR>Also, in reference to K.W. Jeter, I don't accept anything contained in his "sequels" as relevant to the original movie. These sequels are somewhat entertaining, but the world of "Blade Runner" (the movie) begins with the scrolling prologue and ends with Deckard and Rachael riding off towards an uncertain future, in my opinion. Jeter's sequels are, in my opinion, completely irrelevant.<BR><BR><font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: IntelliDroid on 2003-02-14 16:45 ]</font>