FAQ  •  Login

What does Roy say?

Moderator: Wilkins Rep-Detect BR2349

<<

ridleynoir

User avatar

Veteran Blade Runner
Veteran Blade Runner

Posts: 1335

Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2002 6:00 pm

Location: Rochester NY

Post Sun Dec 19, 2004 4:42 am

This is for Ridleynoir:

ridleynoir wrote: If the only reason he spared Deckard's life was that he thought he was a replicant as well that would make Roy kind of "racist" and less human...thus defeating the point of his redemption.


Ridleynoir, I found something you said confusing. How could the act of saving Deckard's life make Roy seem "less human and racist" , he's not human at all, he's artificial? I don't think it defeats redemption. He saves him because he identifies with him. .


Basicly if you only show mercy to someone who is like you, it is not a selfless act. and vice versa. Americans seem to have a problem with this concept. It is much more poignient for Deckard to be human. If he isn't we have less of a reason to question our own humanity.
Image
<<

Leon Corporation

User avatar

Rep Detector Handler
Rep Detector Handler

Posts: 342

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 5:56 pm

Post Sun Dec 19, 2004 6:03 am

True, Ridleynoir. And Deckard may be a replicant as much as he (or Ridley) wants, to Roy he is human.
Image
Leon Corporation Employee
<<

LtColumbo

Rookie Rep Detect
Rookie Rep Detect

Posts: 14

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 1:25 pm

Post Sun Dec 19, 2004 6:47 am

THX1138, I'd never dial up that. I'd rather dial 888 (The desire to watch TV no matter what's on it) and pop open a cold one and channel surf.

:D
<<

LtColumbo

Rookie Rep Detect
Rookie Rep Detect

Posts: 14

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 1:25 pm

Post Sun Dec 19, 2004 7:25 am

ridleynoir wrote:Basicly if you only show mercy to someone who is like you, it is not a selfless act. and vice versa. Americans seem to have a problem with this concept. It is much more poignient for Deckard to be human. If he isn't we have less of a reason to question our own humanity.

RNoir, you originally said: If the only reason he spared Deckard's life was that he thought he was a replicant as well that would make Roy kind of "racist" and less human...thus defeating the point of his redemption.

My point is Roy is a replicant and not a human. Roy cannot be made to seem less human, he's not human at all. Thats's the point, he's an artificial struggling with what he thinks are real human emotions. He's an android. And, I don't think American's have a problem with that at all. Do you know how much humanatarian relieve America provides to the world? do you know how many billions have been spent how much human resource has been used to help develope under developed and suffering nations? I dare to say, more than all other nations combined! I see your from NY... aren't you an American? And, if you live here and feel yourself segregated from American's then why are you here? No insult intended really, just really wondering when someone living in NY makes a statement like that.

Just curiuos, why you injected American politic into this discussion?
<<

Leon Corporation

User avatar

Rep Detector Handler
Rep Detector Handler

Posts: 342

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 5:56 pm

Post Sun Dec 19, 2004 9:23 am

Are political discussions allowed here?

Anyway ...
... he's an artificial struggling with what he thinks are real human emotions.


I've never heard someone put it like this. Nor do I get anywhere the impression that Roy knows Deckard is a replicant. Quite the contrary, it's because of Roy that I'm inclined to believe that Deckard is human and always has been (of course, the film hints towards the opposite). The movie would make no sense if Roy would have know Deckard's replicant. (Rutger Hauer thought he was human too). The replicants NEVER alluded to this once! Besides, wasn't it Roy who said, "I've seen things you people wouldn't believe ... "?
I do feel he's a replicant fighting for more life, like all replicants with a 4-life year span. It's through the replicants, and more specifically through Roy's humane life-saving act, that we ask ourselves what it means to be human.
Image
Leon Corporation Employee
<<

Centauro

User avatar

Blade Runner
Blade Runner

Posts: 729

Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2001 6:00 pm

Location: Bogota, DC [CO]

Post Sun Dec 19, 2004 9:40 am

Lt. Columbo:

I felt a hint of "final truth" when you said ""What does it tell you? I know what it tells me"
To me it sounded kind of pretentious, like "it is so obvious that only a stupid would not note it"..., and I can't talk for ridleynoir but I risk to think it sounded the same way for him, and I think that might have sparked the rookie comment. (BTW, being a rookie on anything is not a bad thing... nobody's born knowing.)

Of course this is a free speech/exchange place, and we all get along very well. So, to get past thta, on the kinship issue, let me put it in these terms... You say he says something, and you back it up with a reference. OK, but I disagree that he says anything, and I just can't produce the counter-reference you are asking for, because contrary to the way you use your reference to show that you're not the only one who hears kinship, I surely won't find people making comments about things they don't percieve as existing in the film... I won't If they don't hear anything there, why would they say anything about it? Do you find comments about the meaning of Bryant wink to Gaff when he makes the origami chicken? Not, because he doesn't wink to Gaff (though someone could say that he did wink, but that happens when the camera is in the close up of the paper chicken, so we can't see it... you get the idea.) m. So, to answer you:

I can't show you documents mentioning that he says something different. I can point again to the existence of lots of documents, some of them very extensive and exhaustive, that don't mention Roy saying anything in that moment. If it was that clear that he utters kinship, it'd be a well known fact. I'd say that if someone actually did something, it should be easy to find plenty of proof (if it exists) that he did, rather than absence of such proof, or even evidence that he didn't do it. (To me, just listening carefully to the scene is enough).

That's what I was pointing: The lack of many more comments and analysis about "kinship".

I only find natural that if you want to get more light on this, you should try to get to the most reliable sources, and since the absence of the kinship line in the scripts and transcripts is not enough for you, (I'm not implying that it should be), I suggested you to give it a try with Rutger... I mean, he's the only one who can tell for sure... Since he's a very nice and, if you're lucky, accesible gentleman, I think you can. I won't do it, because I'm not interested on it... I never heard "kinship", and even trying, I don't hear it... I hear something that sounds a little like that. Now, if you contact Ritger and he says that "kinship" is real, I'll accept it, and wonder why so many of us never noticed. (And of course, I'll thank you very much for helping me to know more and better about my favorite film).

And about the ranking (number of posts), I agree that it doesn't give any measure of knowledge, authority or anything at all. In this Ranks thread:

http://bladezone.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=862&start=30

I already made some comments about what I care about resetting my rank (something that, in fact, already happenened twice, when the forums were moved).

OK. I hope you stay and become a regular, Lt. Columbo. Really, I mean it.
-------------------------------------------------------------- Revel In Your Time --------------------------------------------------------------

Image
<<

ridleynoir

User avatar

Veteran Blade Runner
Veteran Blade Runner

Posts: 1335

Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2002 6:00 pm

Location: Rochester NY

Post Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:03 am

LtColumbo wrote:
ridleynoir wrote:Basicly if you only show mercy to someone who is like you, it is not a selfless act. and vice versa. Americans seem to have a problem with this concept. It is much more poignient for Deckard to be human. If he isn't we have less of a reason to question our own humanity.

RNoir, you originally said: If the only reason he spared Deckard's life was that he thought he was a replicant as well that would make Roy kind of "racist" and less human...thus defeating the point of his redemption.

My point is Roy is a replicant and not a human. Roy cannot be made to seem less human, he's not human at all. Thats's the point, he's an artificial struggling with what he thinks are real human emotions. He's an android. And, I don't think American's have a problem with that at all. Do you know how much humanatarian relieve America provides to the world? do you know how many billions have been spent how much human resource has been used to help develope under developed and suffering nations? I dare to say, more than all other nations combined! I see your from NY... aren't you an American? And, if you live here and feel yourself segregated from American's then why are you here? No insult intended really, just really wondering when someone living in NY makes a statement like that.

Just curiuos, why you injected American politic into this discussion?



The idea of the movie and comparison to humans is to both make us question if the replicants aren't "more human" than the human characters. To say that our "Humanity" has less to do with our biological origins than how we act and how we "feel".

As far as Americans go I would be curious where you got your statistics about Humanitarian aid and compare the per capita $s to see if it still holds up. Plus I would highly recomend reading the "Ugly American" (not the movie). One of JFK's favorite books and the influence for the peace corps. My only real problem with Americans is that we(including myself) often act and feel superior to the rest of the world, and like a bad Jerry Springer guest we keep ourselves in denial about our culpability. Our pride(one of the 7 deadly sins) is biting us in the ass and we are too anesthetized by mass consumerism to see it. And "we" like you have shown that we can basically say to ourselves that "they are not like us" and this is why it makes sense for Roy to not care about human life because he is a replicant. And dont give me the usual about "patriotism" because patriotism without right action and forethought is "nationalism". We have killed a lot of soldiers from other countries for centuries because of their nationalism right or wrong. "Patriotism" should always have at it core the need to do the right thing for all. I believe it is "patriotic" to try to fight within our country for our dignity and modesty.
Last edited by ridleynoir on Sun Dec 19, 2004 7:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
<<

Deckard BR26354

User avatar

Veteran Blade Runner
Veteran Blade Runner

Posts: 1202

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2001 6:00 pm

Location: UK

Post Sun Dec 19, 2004 6:55 pm

I think the problem with the Western world is that the big corporations have too much influence on politics - I like Americans, but I hate what George Bush and his cronies are doing to the world. Blair's no better either.
Richard Gunn

We each live in our own realities - who's maintaining yours?

The only thing that you can be 100% sure of, is that you can't be 100% sure of anything.
<<

THX1138

User avatar

Moderator
Moderator

Posts: 1411

Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2002 6:00 pm

Location: Denver, Colorado

Post Sun Dec 19, 2004 7:05 pm

as an american, i can also say....i hate bush (any president really, even if kerry was elected, i'd hate him too). its the US government in general i hate. its all about money and big corporations. not about what the people want.

anyway, this is another topic.
"Don't be a dick!" -Wil Wheaton
<<

LtColumbo

Rookie Rep Detect
Rookie Rep Detect

Posts: 14

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 1:25 pm

Post Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:16 pm

Recieved an Email concernin Roy Batty saying KINSHIP, from the Author of "Greatest Films Ever".

Hi Joe:

Gosh, I've read many times that he says kinship. But to tell you the truth, since I wrote that review a while ago, I don't remember where. So I just did an Internet search, and it's verified on these pages:

www.cs.uu.nl/wais/html/ na-dir/movies/blade-runner-faq.html

www.imdb.com/title/tt0083658/quotes

www.brmovie.com/FAQs/BR_FAQ_Deck-a-Rep.htm


There are probably more mentions, but those are three where it specifically states what he says. Hope that helps:


Tim Dirks
Greatest Films, Author-Manager
http://www.filmsite.org


Again, Research is key. I feel it's important to BACK UP what you write.

Have a Good Holiday all... :D
<<

Deckard BR26354

User avatar

Veteran Blade Runner
Veteran Blade Runner

Posts: 1202

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2001 6:00 pm

Location: UK

Post Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:34 pm

Right, so if I put up a page on Bladezone stating that he doesn't say anything, will you include that in your research list?
Richard Gunn

We each live in our own realities - who's maintaining yours?

The only thing that you can be 100% sure of, is that you can't be 100% sure of anything.
<<

LtColumbo

Rookie Rep Detect
Rookie Rep Detect

Posts: 14

Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 1:25 pm

Post Tue Dec 21, 2004 5:03 pm

Just back it up. Anything else I'm not responding to now. I want to wish you a good holiday dude... don't stress it.
<<

Centauro

User avatar

Blade Runner
Blade Runner

Posts: 729

Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2001 6:00 pm

Location: Bogota, DC [CO]

Post Tue Dec 21, 2004 10:04 pm

Wait... gotta write this down.

Research is the key

OK, I got it. Thanks.

By the way, here's a page that might be of interest for you, dude. :P :lol: Happy Holidays for you too, and:
-------------------------------------------------------------- Revel In Your Time --------------------------------------------------------------

Image
<<

Deckard BR26354

User avatar

Veteran Blade Runner
Veteran Blade Runner

Posts: 1202

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2001 6:00 pm

Location: UK

Post Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:19 am

LtColumbo wrote:Just back it up. Anything else I'm not responding to now. I want to wish you a good holiday dude... don't stress it.


Well, all you've done is 'back up' your opinion with someone else's opinion and presented it as some sort of 'absolute' proof. That isn't really a convincing argument, is it?

You do know that IMDB is maintained by movie fans, don't you? You or I can submit amendments to the that page you linked to and then present it as some sort of 'fact'. In other words, it's just someone elses opinion.

The first and third links you gave are the same info and again, just somone else's opinion.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not 'stressed', I just like to point out flawed 'evidence/proof' when I see it.

Merry Xmas. 8)
Richard Gunn

We each live in our own realities - who's maintaining yours?

The only thing that you can be 100% sure of, is that you can't be 100% sure of anything.
<<

Leon Corporation

User avatar

Rep Detector Handler
Rep Detector Handler

Posts: 342

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 5:56 pm

Post Wed Dec 22, 2004 5:40 am

I believe it when I hear it from Rutger himself. Now how hard can it be? Go on, email him!
Image
Leon Corporation Employee
PreviousNext

Return to Blade Runner Round Table

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests